tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514762.post8689387762466338573..comments2009-08-02T11:42:17.327+02:00Christophhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04620585689052142109noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514762.post-74174274797026698352009-08-02T11:33:55.055+02:002009-08-02T11:33:55.055+02:00this is a smart idea. and maybe one-day, yes. <br /><br />but until then, i think until &#39;the building&#39; becomes more about the user/user experience; only then will the architect no longer reign supreme. <br /><br />until then- architectural photography in itself is still such a &#39;niche&#39; area/money-maker/marketing tool for the architectural profession... that this user group would either have to be transposed onto a new level of work with &#39;the architect&#39;... who must now work with the photographer throughout the whole designing process- because now architects&#39; must think how their buildings will be represented on way-finding websites or other media designed to be viewed by &#39;the public&#39;. <br /><br />and therefore. the &#39;the public&#39; must be able to obtain these photos for websites such as satguru.com. thus rendering copyrights fees for architectural photographs obsolete... then again we could just be drifting into a new age of copyrights...john does Amsterdamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15443739887233713460noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5514762.post-36416817464671148782009-07-17T17:53:16.264+02:002009-07-17T17:53:16.264+02:00Eh, I don&#39;t think it would help very much. A lot of building seating changes because the seating isn&#39;t set in a permanent place. The only other instance I can think of is concert seating, and they usually already have a seating chart on the website where you purchase tickets. This was a very good idea though for the plane seating, for most people who don&#39;t know the different classes of planes and such.bonniethegreenbuilderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14279819051357015552noreply@blogger.com